Envestat is a series of monthly reports that deliver powerful insights, trends, and predictions about investor behavior and advisory practices brought to you by Envestnet. Each edition focuses on a specific area of interest shaping the industry.
We intend to offer industry leading insights through the intersection of our data and human capital. This is part of our deep commitment to empower advisors with better information to grow their business and better serve their clients.
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST to receive reports as we release them.
The desire to structure and manage client portfolios is oftentimes part of the advisor’s value proposition. Selecting investments and being responsible for those decisions can be a worthwhile endeavor. But how effective is it in the long run?
Given that a major portion of industry managed account assets are in advisor-managed programs (APM)—some $1.5 trillion—we thought it would be useful to look at the performance of these portfolios, not only year to date as of 7/31/18 but over one-year and three-year periods, as well.
We dug into the data held on the ENV Analytics platform to answer a few fundamental questions:
-What percentage of advisors are outperforming their benchmarks and delivering alpha?
-What percentage of advisors are generating negative returns for their clients?
-What differentiates top-performing vs. bottom-tier advisors?
With the first half of 2018 now behind us, it’s a great time to trace how managed account programs have fared thus far this year in terms of sales, redemptions, and net flows.
So we ran the data to learn:
• What was the increase/decrease in sales and flows in the first half of 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017?
• How did the product distribution of sales and flows compare to 2017?
• Did redemptions have a meaningful impact on net flows?
The investment community is rife with questions about the market effect of rising interest rates and January’s return of market volatility. So we thought that analyzing inflows on the Envestnet platform could provide some perspective on whether the market is reflecting less risk and, secondly, which asset classes are experiencing the most movement. We found that the composition of inflows has indeed begun to shift, consistent with a more cautious mindset.
The investment world is abuzz these days with impact investing—including Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Socially Responsible Investing (SRI)—which enables investors to sync their portfolios with their values and principles. Millennials and women in particular are expressing demand for this capability, but advisors have been slow on the uptake. But, does this hold true with advisors who use Envestnet's platform?
In our May Envestat, we set out to address some key questions:
- -How concentrated are total returns across APM, FSP, and UMA portfolios?
- -What accounts for the extreme outliers?
- -How can advisors avoid excessive volatility in their clients’ portfolios?
One consideration advisors must weigh when contemplating outsourcing is the impact it may have on fees. With this in mind, we thought it would be worthwhile to examine the economics of APM and FSP programs to help advisors determine which approach makes sense for their practice.
As noted last year, fund strategist portfolios (FSPs) are growing at a healthy pace. This prompted us to explore whether increased usage of FSP products by advisors on our platform was having a material impact on overall managed account sales, flows, and assets.
How are managed account assets projected to grow over the next 6 months? In this Envestat report, we analyzed past managed account data to come up with a forecast for gross sales, redemptions, and net flows for the first half of 2018.